In the TED Talk below, Sal Khan shares the opportunities he sees for students and teachers to collaborate with AI tools – including the potential of a personal AI assistant for every student and every teacher – and demonstrates how he has implemented AI within his Khan Academy.
Read also: Should we use AI for guidance? | Wilfred Rubens
When you, as a student, choose to have AI complete your study assignments and submit them as if you had done them yourself, the use of AI becomes harmful. However, when you employ AI as a tool to support your own learning process, AI can indeed have a positive influence.
Below, you will find various ways in which you can use AI as a personal study coach (Last & Sprakel, 2024; O&T, n.d.). Look at the Prompt engineering tab in this library guide for specific prompts related to this type of AI use and under the Tools tab in this library guide for an overview of specific tools that can be employed.
Teachers can use AI tools as valuable teaching assistants, for example in (Ding et al., n.d.):
Points of attention in this regard are that, on the one hand, the information that generative AI tools convincingly present as complete and entirely accurate often is not, and on the other hand, privacy and confidentiality issues may arise. Extensive testing with these considerations in mind and, above all, a strong focus on responsible use and prompts (see the responsible use tab in this library guide) are therefore essential! The step-by-step plan below can serve as a guideline if you, as a teacher, want to start using GenAI in your teaching:
A recent framework titled 'The AI Assessment Scale' distinguishes five levels of AI use in assignments (Last & Sprakel, 2024):
You can assign one of these five levels to each assignment (or part of it), making it clear to students to what extent a GenAI tool is allowed. More information about the AI Assessment Scale can be found in this blog by one of its creators and the accompanying article.
Below are specific ways in which AI can be used in teaching (Last & Sprakel, 2024). Check the Prompt engineering tab in this library guide for specific prompts related to this type of AI use and under the Tools tab in this library guide for an overview of specific tools that can be used.
The rise of GenAI compels us to evaluate and adapt our approaches to writing assignments. Use the following strategies for this:
By introducing students to AI in their studies, they not only learn to use AI effectively but also develop the ethical and philosophical insights necessary to deploy these technologies responsibly. This provides them with the essential skills and competencies to navigate an increasingly technology-driven society, ensuring that higher education remains not only current but also guiding future developments. We share activating teaching methods below for inspiration.
Teaching Method: Reverse Engineering
Provide students with a text or an image, either authentic or generated by GenAI, and then ask them to create a prompt that produces a result as similar as possible to the original (Last & Sprakel, 2024). Ensure that students have access to an AI tool to test their prompts, allowing them to continually revise and improve them. This reverse thinking approach encourages students to closely examine the various aspects and specific characteristics of the text or image, and how to refine them to achieve a particular output.
Through this playful process, students learn how GenAI generates output and what constitutes an effective prompt. They also come to understand that the quality of GenAI results is directly proportional to the input it receives. This exercise enables students to better utilise AI tools themselves as they enter the professional world.
Teaching Method: AI-Assisted Introduction Writing
Have students write an introduction on a topic using GenAI. Provide specific instructions on the use of the AI tool. For example: You may only adjust the prompt twice. This encourages students to think carefully about the modifications they wish to make. After receiving the AI tool's output, the student may further refine it themselves. This teaches students not only to adopt AI output verbatim, but to view it as input upon which they can expand. The final version of the introduction is then discussed. Is this introduction usable? Have students choose a topic for the introduction about which they are knowledgeable. This enables them to effectively evaluate the AI output and stimulates their critical perspective.
Here and here you can find more ideas for AI-based teaching methods. You can also find open educational resources involving AI on the Edusources platform (scroll down or click on this link for the latest publications):
Do you have any interesting AI-based teaching methods of your own? Let us know! You can find contact options on this page. We'd be delighted to add them to this list. Alternatively, you can add them yourself as open educational resources to Edusources and include the keyword AI. Your teaching method will then automatically appear in the results list above.
The possibilities offered by generative AI call for a more robust reflection on the role of assessment in various degree programmes and a shift from (summative) control towards (formative) development of students. When assessment more closely mirrors the demands of students' professional practice, two key questions emerge:
To make assessments AI-proof, a critical examination of learning objectives is necessary. Learning outcomes can be personalised in the execution of studies, tasks, and assignments in such a way that the student's motivation is to conduct their own research and focus on their personal development. This will require a different perspective on the content and coherence of learning objectives or learning outcomes in the degree programme profiles.
Focus on narrative feedback and development in the process. Explicitly inquire about how AI was used and what was learned from it.
Below are several ways in which AI can be employed in assessment, evaluation, and feedback (Last & Sprakel, 2024).
Automated feedback and assessment appear to be an attractive application of GenAI in education. It offers the potential for faster, more personalised, unique, and perhaps more objective feedback. For teachers, automated feedback and assessment could mean significant time savings. Additionally, feedback generated by GenAI can contribute to more learning path-independent education and a richer dataset for learning analytics. However, GenAI can produce inaccurate and sometimes simply erroneous output when providing feedback or assessment. Moreover, the GDPR contains a prohibition on "solely automated processing-based decisions that have legal or otherwise significant consequences for the data subject". Automated assessment in education undoubtedly has significant consequences for students (Ding et al., n.d.)!
A balanced approach can lead to greater effectiveness (Last & Sprakel, 2024). Use AI tools to provide rapid and objective feedback on lower-order aspects of writing (such as spelling, grammar, structure), whilst you, as the teachers, concentrate on giving qualitative feedback on higher-order aspects (such as argumentation, reasoning, and creativity).
AI can be employed not only in the delivery of education and the development of educational materials but also in the development of education itself (Last & Sprakel, 2024).
How to Achieve AI-Ready Education: A Guide.
(Aarts & Themmen, 2024)
Various aspects that should be addressed within the institution so that an educational team can make their teaching AI-ready (Harmsen, 2024):
Teachers can find ideas and inspiration at aiforteachers.com.
Additionally, there is the English-language website AI for Education with free trainings and downloads for use in education.
If you, as a teacher, wish to delve deeper into the responsible use of GenAI in education and its potential impact on your own teaching, you'll find two comprehensive, free online training courses below. These are offered by other institutions but are also accessible to external participants. Although the KU Leuven training also indicates students as a target group, the content and scope of the training make it more suitable for teachers.